Venezuela condemns “colonialist threat” after US orders airspace shut

The Venezuelan government condemned as a “colonialist threat” US President Donald Trump’s order closing all airspace above Venezuela, calling for respect for national sovereignty.

 

Venezuelan airspace dispute with the U.S. amid government condemnation of Trump’s closure order and rising regional tensions.

CARACAS, Venezuela — 2025-11-30. The government of Venezuela has rejected a directive by the United States that declared Venezuelan airspace “closed in its entirety,” calling the move an illegal attempt to undermine the country’s sovereignty.

 

Airspace closure declaration and immediate fallout

 

On 29 November 2025, President Trump posted on social media that all aircraft — including “Airlines, Pilots, Drug Dealers, and Human Traffickers” — should regard the airspace above and around Venezuela as entirely closed.

In response, the Venezuelan government denounced the declaration as a “colonialist threat” that violated international law and demanded respect for its sovereignty. Venezuelan authorities said they would reject any foreign orders or threats concerning their airspace.

As a direct result of the closure order, all migrant deportation flights to Venezuela have reportedly been suspended — a move that further escalated tensions between Caracas and Washington.

 

Wider impact on aviation and international carriers

 

The closure announcement built on earlier turbulence in Venezuela’s aviation sector. On 21 November 2025, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) warned major airlines of a “potentially hazardous situation” when flying over Venezuela citing a “worsening security situation and heightened military activity.”

In reaction, many international carriers suspended flights to and from the country. Subsequently, on 27 November, the Venezuelan government revoked the operating permits of six major airlines — including major carriers from Europe and Latin America — citing their decision to suspend flights as participation in what it called “state terrorism” promoted by the United States.

These developments have significantly disrupted international air travel to Venezuela, leaving only a handful of foreign and domestic airlines still operating.

 

Strategic context: escalating US-Venezuela tensions

 

The airspace closure directive comes amid a broader escalation in U.S. pressure on the government of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. According to U.S. officials, covert operations are planned against Venezuela, and military deployments in the Caribbean have increased in recent weeks.

Since September 2025, the U.S. has carried out several maritime strikes targeting vessels alleged to be involved in drug trafficking from Venezuelan shores. These operations have reportedly resulted in dozens of deaths, prompting accusations from Caracas that the U.S. is engaging in extrajudicial killings.

Venezuela has denied any links to drug trafficking, and its government argues that the military and diplomatic pressure aims at destabilizing the country and possibly overthrowing Maduro.

 

Government reaction and public stance

 

Venezuelan authorities have publicly rejected the U.S. order, calling it a threat to national sovereignty and international norms. The government has vowed not to comply with foreign directives about control of its airspace.

In addition to suspending deportation flights, Caracas has warned that any attempts to enforce the closure without its consent would amount to a breach of aviation and international law. The reaction underscores Caracas’s demand for respect for Venezuelan territorial integrity.

 

What comes next amid uncertainty

 

At present, it remains unclear whether the U.S. intends to enforce an actual no-fly zone or whether the order is primarily symbolic. U.S. officials, including the Pentagon, have not provided further clarification.

International airlines and civil aviation authorities are monitoring the situation closely, while legal experts warn that unilateral closure of another nation’s airspace without consent could be considered a violation of international law.

Meanwhile, Venezuela’s government has signalled readiness to defend its sovereignty and has not ruled out further action if the U.S. escalates. With tensions intensifying, the immediate future of Venezuelan airspace — and broader regional stability — remains uncertain.

 

Author: CRN Times Staff - Editor-in-Chief: Maria Perez

Photo: Cristian Hernandez / AP (illustrative)

 

 

Publicar un comentario

Artículo Anterior Artículo Siguiente

نموذج الاتصال