LAS VEGAS, UNITED STATES — A jury found Duane “Keffe D” Davis guilty of first-degree murder nearly 30 years after Tupac Shakur was fatally shot in Las Vegas.
A Las Vegas jury convicted Duane “Keffe D” Davis on Monday of first-degree murder with a deadly weapon in the 1996 killing of rapper Tupac Shakur, resolving the trial of the only person ever criminally charged in one of hip-hop’s longest-running murder cases.
Jurors reached the verdict after roughly three hours of deliberations following closing arguments on August 31. The decision was read in court at about 5:15 p.m. PDT. Davis, 63, is due to return for sentencing on October 13.
The conviction did not depend on prosecutors proving that Davis personally fired at Shakur. Their case was that Davis organized the retaliatory attack after Shakur and members of his entourage assaulted Davis's nephew, Orlando “Baby Lane” Anderson, at the MGM Grand earlier on September 7, 1996.
Shakur was shot later that night while riding in a vehicle driven by Death Row Records co-founder Marion “Suge” Knight. The 25-year-old rapper died six days later. Davis was indicted in 2023, almost 27 years after the shooting, and pleaded not guilty.
Years of Davis's own accounts became central evidence
A central issue at trial was what jurors should make of Davis's statements about the killing over many years.
Prosecutors relied on recorded interviews, public appearances and Davis's 2019 memoir, Compton Street Legend, arguing that his repeated descriptions of his role were supported by other evidence and testimony. Chief Deputy District Attorney Binu Palal told jurors that Davis had repeatedly described responsibility for Shakur's killing to police and in public.
The defense attacked precisely that foundation.
Defense attorney Michael Sanft argued that Davis's accounts were inconsistent and that stories associated with the memoir were exaggerated or fabricated for money and publicity. The defense also challenged the investigation and emphasized the absence of physical evidence directly placing Davis at the shooting.
Jurors ultimately rejected the defense's reasonable-doubt argument and returned a guilty verdict on first-degree murder with a deadly weapon.
The prosecution had initially pursued a gang-related enhancement as part of the case but dropped that enhancement because of witness logistics, according to reporting after the verdict.
The 1996 date matters to the sentencing framework
The October sentencing hearing is more complicated than simply describing life without parole as the only possible outcome.
Nevada's first-degree murder statute provides imprisonment alternatives that include life without parole, life with parole eligibility after a minimum of 20 years, or a 50-year term with parole eligibility after 20 years.
The deadly-weapon finding adds another historical issue because Shakur was shot in September 1996.
Nevada's present-day NRS 193.165 generally provides an additional deadly-weapon prison term of one to 20 years. But that was not the statutory structure in effect when Shakur was killed. The 1995 Nevada statute provided that use of a firearm or other deadly weapon carried an additional prison term equal to the term imposed for the underlying crime, running consecutively.
A later Nevada Legislative Counsel Bureau analysis illustrates the change specifically for first-degree murder: for offenses from 1995 through 2007, its comparison shows a 20-year minimum on a parole-eligible first-degree murder sentence paired with a 20-year deadly-weapon enhancement, compared with the one-to-20-year enhancement structure adopted after 2007.
The court, rather than news reports, will determine the sentence applicable to Davis. The historical statutory record nevertheless means the consequences of the deadly-weapon verdict should not be described solely by reference to Nevada's current enhancement provision.
A prosecution nearly three decades after the shooting
Davis's conviction is the first criminal verdict in Shakur's killing.
Although investigators scrutinized several people over the decades, Davis remained the only person charged. The other three men whom prosecutors and Davis's previous accounts placed in the Cadillac involved in the attack have died.
The passage of time became part of the defense case. Sanft questioned why Davis had not been prosecuted earlier if his previous statements amounted to genuine admissions, while prosecutors argued those accounts were not isolated claims but were corroborated by evidence presented during the trial.
The verdict therefore settles the jury's determination of criminal guilt but does not end the legal proceedings.
After the decision was announced, Davis told the court that he wanted to appeal. Judge Carli Kierny explained that the appeal could proceed after sentencing and set the sentencing hearing for October 13.
That hearing is now the next confirmed stage of the case. Any appeal would follow the entry of judgment and sentence.
More from this section
Crime- Loading related stories…